A video capturing the moment Donald Trump ordered the destruction of a submarine suspected of carrying drugs has sparked controversy. The submarine was obliterated near Venezuela, with Trump claiming the operation eliminated two alleged “narcoterrorists.” The President revealed that the drug-smuggling vessel was intercepted by US officials while en route to the United States.
Trump disclosed on his social media platform that the submarine was loaded with fentanyl and other illegal substances. He expressed pride in thwarting the vessel’s progress, emphasizing its role in narcotics trafficking. Survivors of the explosion have been apprehended, with Colombian President Gustavo Petro affirming their impending legal prosecution.
This recent strike marks the Trump administration’s 28th military action against vessels in the region, raising concerns over the legality and ethics of the approach. The President justifies these operations as part of an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, drawing on legal authority akin to the post-9/11 War on Terror measures. However, critics challenge the legality and international ramifications of such aggressive tactics.
The fate of the survivors remains uncertain, with debates swirling around their legal status as combatants or criminal defendants. The strikes have prompted bipartisan unease in Congress, leading to calls for greater transparency and oversight on military actions. Efforts to constrain Trump’s authority in engaging with Venezuela without congressional consent are underway, underscoring the ongoing debate on executive powers in military operations.
This article may contain cookies and data usage policies.
